Tag Archives: Richard. E. Hennessey

Number and Reality 3: The Demonstration That 2 Plus 2 Are 4 Spelled Out

(You will find below the demonstration, promised in the title of this post, that 2 plus 2 are 4. First, however, I have to say something about the post I have been promising, but failing, to publish for some time … Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy of Mathematics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Number and Reality 2. Towards a Philosophy of Mathematics Bibliography

[This post is an exact replacement for the now deleted “Number and Reality 3.” One should not, I think we can all agree, have “Number and Reality 3” immediately succeed “Number and Reality 1” in a series devoted to number … Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy of Mathematics | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Number and Reality 1. Some Initial Questions and the Initial Question

1. In the immediately previous post, I observed that I now find myself enjoying the leisure that will allow me “to engage in some serious thinking in the philosophy of mathematics.” More specifically, I announced my intention “to begin the … Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy of Mathematics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ontological Arithmetic. The Second Foot in the Door

Greetings. In the immediately previous post, the “Ontological Arithmetic. One Realistic Foot in the Door of the Philosophy of Mathematics” of September 24, 2020, I said that in the present post I would “spell out how one can prove, demonstrate, … Continue reading

Posted in Philosophy of Mathematics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reflecting on Russell’s Religion and Science 3. Russell as a Skeptic, Even with Respect to Science

1. The present post is the third in a series of posts reflecting on the philosophical theses at work in Bertrand Russell’s Religion and Science.* In the series’ previous posts, I have directed attention to Russell’s “exclusivist epistemological scientism,” as … Continue reading

Posted in Bertrand Russell’s Religion and Science | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reflecting on Russell’s Religion and Science 2. Its Scientism Confirmed and Two Complications Raised

1. The present post is the second in a series of posts reflecting on the philosophical theses at work in Bertrand Russell’s Religion and Science.* In the series’ opening post, I did three things pertinent to the present one. First, … Continue reading

Posted in Scientism | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reflecting on Russell’s Religion and Science 1. Scientism and the Four Purported Magisteria

1. One reason why I have not been posting over the past months is because I have been caught up in the teaching of courses new to me, in ethics, medical ethics, and environmental ethics. These having been courses for … Continue reading

Posted in Scientism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment